The noble anti-AI approach

The human mind is not a machine. There are issues about
the understanding of the fundamental physics of matter,
touching on things which could relate to mind, if you
study how Louis de Broglie (co-author of the core
quantum theory) diverged from David Bohm's causal
interpretation of quantum theory (which was rejected by
de Broglie's pioneering friends) by rewriting half of it,
in 1956 (in a manner ignored by the other authors of
quantum theory) and onwards. In sum: the grand questions,
also about what the mind is, are still open. There is no
proof -- anywhere -- that the human mind and its 
intelligence and its empathic intelligence can ever be
reduced to any chip or algorithm or manipulation of 
quantum mechanics in a laboratory or any combination 
of such. There are on the contrary core works which
indicate that artificial intelligence is and will be
a blatant illusion, and that the risk is solely that
this illusion is not seen for what it is. (For some
of these core works, cfr other texts linked to by the
yoga6d.org/look.htm anti-AI search engine portal.)
Humanity must take an anti-AI stance; journalists must
refuse to use the scifi notion "AI" casually, as if it
refers to a fact; and in general, we must prefer such
approaches to computing which do not mimick mind and 
thus can contribute to a generally stupification of
mankind. In this, we must stand up and assert that it
is better to use mind and do things perhaps sometimes
slightly slower than to not use mind and live by the
dictatorship of machines. This is about believing in
mind, insight, intuition, and a spontaniety which 
goes beyond mere machine, -- also as love, as action,
whether in business life or in relationship or in sex.
This is the noble anti-AI stance, and it gives great
energy to live by it. --A.Tacoma, May 2015

(feel free to reproduce this when unchanged.)